![]() |
0.3.0
|
where
see
The body rate with respect to the navigation frame can be expressed as
this together with the skew-symmetric matrix transformation (see [17] Groves, ch. 2.3.1, eq. 2.51, p. 45)
leads to the skew symmetric form of
The gimbal angles (roll),
(pitch),
(yaw) are related to the body rates as follows:
where
see
The quaternion propagates as (see [47] Titterton, ch. 3.6.4.3, eq. 3.60-3.62, p. 44)
where
This can be written in matrix form as
and this can be written in matrix form again as
see
The derivative of the velocity in local-navigation coordinates can be expressed as
where
see
where
see
Different books have different forms of the quaternion propagation, therefore this shall be discussed here.
The matrix form for the propagation is (see [47] Titterton, ch. 11.2.5, eq. 11.33-11.35, p. 319)
which can be converted into a direction cosine matrix with
the quaternion is defined as (see [47] Titterton, ch. 3.6.4.2, eq. 3.57, p. 43)
Jekeli defines the equations from the body frame to an arbitrary frame, which in our case is the n-frame. Therefore his equations become ([24] Jekeli, ch. 4.2.3.1, eq. 4.20, p. 114)
The quaternion is defined by Jekeli over the direction cosine matrix which is ([24] Jekeli, ch. 4.2.3.1, eq. 4.22, p. 114)
Comparing Jekeli's DCM with Titterton's
, it can easily be shown, that the quaternion is the complex conjugate (see [24] Jekeli, ch. 4.2.3.1, eq. 4.21,4.23, p. 114f)
Replacing the complex conjugated quaternion leads to the same equation as Titterton's
Groves defines his Quaternion update in two arbitrary frames ([17] Groves, Appendix E, ch. E.6.2, eq. E.32, p. E-12)
This can be expresed for the body rate with respect to the navigation frame in body frame coordinates
which is the same as Titterton and Jekeli